Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Essayists: The Chicken or the Egg?


Writing an essay about writing an essay is something most essayists may say they’ve never done. The very idea of it seems to be a little bit vain. Theoretically, every essayist writes an essay the same as every other essayist. This is not a cheap shot at essays or essayists; in fact it is the exact opposite. An essayist writes as though he/she is the guide on a midnight journey. The reader on this journey does not know where they will end up, or how to get wherever they are going. Only able to see that which is directly in front of them, blind to everything else. The guide leads them on a path that is unique to his/her own self and in most cases, a path that he/she believes is best. Some readers may disagree with the path taken or even the final destination. However, by looking close enough at the path travelled, the true identity of the guide may be revealed. Presumably, the essay can say a lot more about the essayist, than the essayist can say about the essay.

The deadline is quickly approaching and little, if any work has been done. There were going to be a lot of great ideas included but getting rid of some of them, maybe most of them will save a lot of time. Procrastination is a bug that bites all, from the best to the worst. Sometimes great works will be achieved in the dying days of a deadline; sometimes not.

Absolutely every angle has been covered. All the loose ends have been tied, undoubtedly. The information is probable, persuasive and smooth. Thorough is not just the word that best describes this style but it is actually the middle name of the essayist who practices it.

Hard-hitting opinions disguised as intelligence, insisting a thesis instead of proving it, perhaps restricting any conflicting or contradicting evidence. The bullish writer has many admirers in the house of mirrors. This headstrong pencil pusher is his/her own biggest fan. The definition of fan naturally being: blower of air.

The preceding examples are merely minor in comparison to the majority of possibilities. Though, they illustrate that a style of essay can reveal much about he/she who writes it. Any style may be entertaining in its own way, providing it has one key ingredient: creativity. Writing is a creative process. In fact, it seems hard to imagine a single piece of writing that did not have at least some creativity. Writing needs creativity, no matter the style, no matter the category. Categorizing writing can be tough and possibly a mistake for the essayist. It is similar to categorizing music. If a musician tries to write a song but is too concerned about staying within a contrived category, confinement will consume creativity.

Creativity produces anticipation and excitement. The guide who chooses the path with unforgettable scenery leaves an impression on those he/she guides, at the same time the essayist whose creativity walks the edge of ingenuity awards the reader with an eagerness to know more.

Every essayist has strengths and weaknesses. Strangely enough, refusing to acknowledge weaknesses may be an essayist’s biggest strength. Do not fear the pen; do not fear the keyboard. Writing with no other purpose in mind but to find a purpose is a good way to exhilarate strengths. This could be compared to jamming on a guitar or even walking through Wal-Mart. Entering that big, blue and white store, not really knowing where to go or what to buy can be intimidating but a casual step by step process that includes ignoring unnecessary distractions may result in leaving with a really nice, low-priced sweater. That is a true strength; finding the really nice sweater that is hiding somewhere beneath a plethora of thoughts, words, interruptions and opinions.

Every essay is a creation. Every essayist is a creator. No creation can be created incorrectly, only created as a snapshot of the creator’s state of mind. The essay parallels the essayist . . . Or is it the other way around? Now if you’ll please excuse me. I have some reading to do. I, myself look forward to finding out what type of person this essayist truly is.

No comments:

Post a Comment